But we should not be mistaken in assuming that these questions are being raised in good faith. None of these people – Greene, Trump, Carlson or Owens – should be said to be assessing the situation with critical objectivity, raising the question only after carefully considering the evidence and weight of the facts. their affirmation. Instead, each is interested in promoting some aspect of the Good Trump – bad government duality. If defending Trump or cutting government means raising unfounded suspicions about the role of government actors in the violence, so be it.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/12/23/trumpland-has-new-favorite-jan-6-conspiracy-theory/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=wp_politics Trumpland has a new favorite conspiracy theory about the January 6 uprising
Cet article est traduit automatiquement. N’hésitez pas à nous signaler s’il y a des erreurs.